I think you make a good point about human limitations. Well said!

And, it's quite an assumption to think a computer program we create will help us "see further and deeper" into the nature of reality. I do think AI will help us find trends in massive amounts of data, and there are obviously benefits being derived from that in science and medicine.

But any AI we build will ultimately be built of human thought components. To assign a computer the kind of grasp of the nature of the cosmos and of consciousness may be your belief, but I don't see it as inevitable or even a logical outcome of AIs.

Of course, as my wife reminds me daily, I have been wrong before. To err is human...and will we be able to build a machine any more perfect than us?